Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Humana Festival for New American Plays

I love this time of year. The snow is melting with any luck. There's more sunlight in my day. Best of all, the Humana Festival turns the heads of America towards Louisville and focuses it on new works.

Let us not be mistaken. Actors Theatre of Louisville is not by any stretch of the imagination the only company that is so devoted to new works. I'm a subscriber at two theater companies right here in Chicago, Steppenwolf Theatre Company and Victory Gardens Theater, that are renown for their devotion to new works. I find gems in all sorts of places like the charming Sansculottes Theater's 13 Dead Husbands.

But when I was still just a pure consumer of new plays many, many years ago in the cultural wasteland of my youth, it was the Humana Festival that I knew by name. Don't be surprised if that's the name most casual consumers also equate with excellence in new works.

I have to admit that part of my love affair with Humana may be the personal connection I feel to them even though I have yet to attend a single festival (which I fully intend to fix by next year, I assure you). I briefly knew Marc Masterson, their artistic director, when he was still one of the most innovative minds in theatre at City Theatre in Pittsburgh. Jennifer Bielstein, the Managing Director, has strong roots to the aforementioned Steppenwolf and so many other theater companies here in Chicago. Neither of them would likely know me by name or face at the moment, but I still love to root for the home-town heroes.

All of that is to say, what comes out of that festival is pure gold, if not commercially then certainly as part of a process that has mitigated a great deal of risk in producing new plays by a long campaign of excellence and good marketing on the festival's part.

The New York Times review of this year's festival gives us all a little peek into what we can hope graces our stages in the coming years. It wasn't the main focus of the article, but I'm probably most looking forward to seeing someone else produce "This Beautiful City" here in Chicago. I'm not a member of the religious right by any stretch of the imagination, but here is a play that dedicates itself to helping me understand a point of view and a lifestyle that is completely foreign to me.

I love that sort of piece that challenges my schemas. Let me understand all of that through an honest heartfelt piece like what is described there. Through understanding comes the potential for dialogue and common ground. Through dialogue and common ground, maybe can find a place for all our diverse cultures in this country with resorting to mass-assimilation.

Many kudos go though to Gina Gionfriddo whose "Becky Shaw" received the grand lion's share of the accolades this year. I highly appreciate any play and playwright that is getting compared favorably to a Chicago-born show like "August: Osage County" by Tracy Letts. (There's Steppenwolf stepping into the picture again...) It's her action twists, turns of phrase, and one-liners/zingers that seem to capture Mr. Isherwood's attention the most and dub it with that highly-sought-after designation as being "Broadway-bound".

So I leave you today with some questions. Let me into your process. I find it fascinating to talk about. It need not be rhetorical. What do you seek for your audience to walk away with? How are you making your message memorable? Are witty one-liners the only way?

5 comments:

H. Blake Hollon said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

First of all, thank you for the site. I'm looking forward to see how it develops in the future.

Regarding my process, I can't say that I always take into account the play's message to the audience. I try, first and foremost, to write something entertaining. My theory is that if an audience is bored, then all the messages in the world won't get through.

That's probably where the witty one-liners come in.

But after I've created a work with a satisfying story, structure and characters, then I go back and try to subtly add in some dialogue that approaches the thematic statements I'm trying to make. Quite like building a house: I try to make sure it won't fall down and has all of the rooms and space I need it to have before I think about decorating.

As a final thought: if "Becky Shaw" even nears the wonder of "August" then I must say that I'm quite looking forward to the production.

David Zoltan said...

I think you're spot on in that one of the most powerful messages in the world is "be entertained" and any audience appreciates that being a primary theme. Few of us like to be preached at nowadays outside of a church.

Still, one of the things I and many other avid theatre-goers that I've talked to over the years love about going to a show is being able to talk about it afterwards. Post-show discussions aren't for everyone, but even if you're talking about the show afterwards over drinks, I think it's good to be able to identify what the big themes are. Talking about production values can only entertain you for so long. It makes you feel smarter being able to discuss the message of a play in my experience. Don't you think?

Anonymous said...

Absolutely, I agree. I just saw "A Steady Rain" and I was thinking and talking about it for days. I'm not sure how much of a real message it carried (cops are people too?), but it was razor-sharp, powerful and vastly entertaining.

I think I'm of the style that an audience should extract their own message from the events/dialogue that are presented to them. Since an event could mean something different to each audience member, I think it's a bit of a cheat (sometimes) to do the interpreting for them. I concede that the playwright should definitely have his own perspective on the material (otherwise he could just as easily write textbooks), but I personally think that decision-making process should come in the particular events/words that are chosen to be inserted into the script. For instance, the recent movie "A Mighty Heart" was presented very much like a documentary, without much aggrandizing, but its excellence derived as much from what it left out as from what it put in.

That's what I think, anyway.

Anonymous said...

Let me into your process. I find it fascinating to talk about. It need not be rhetorical.

Stay out of my head, you freak! Er... my writing process involves diners, music, people watching, and trying to funnel the bad shit from where I've shoved it into a corner out onto a piece of paper.

What do you seek for your audience to walk away with?

Some sort of emotional and/or mental impact. I can't hope to know what's going through their heads, I just want to nudge 'em a little.

How are you making your message memorable? Are witty one-liners the only way?

Crap, I hope not. Relation through character development has been my mantra.